My take from that guy was a bit more than that. Primarily, it was a complete lack of any attempt to disguise or vary the scheme that was the real issue. It made it very simple for Ewers and Sark to read, slice and dice.
Hopefully Simmons’ speed and length destroys their tackle guards and disrupts many run and pass plays.
Leavitt also has to be accounted for since he is slippery and can make plays with his feet. The interior and edges need to contain and collapse the pocket. No doubt our DL can overmatch their OL, but undisciplined play will result in Leavitt breaking free for gains. Assignment sound football will take care of both Leavitt and Skattebo -- game over.
I disliked the question about Arch. There's a million other more relevant questions to ask Quinn, IMO. That one would have been better put to Sark or Arch himself, IMO.
While he doesn't come across as enthusiastic or glowing, I thought he generally gave good answers to the questions. I liked how he handled the Deandre Moore question @ 5:16 in particular.
Acho is so full of it. As if Venables had no idea what kind of athletes he needs for the SEC coming from Clemson under Dabo. He really doesn't know how to make his argument. No mention whatsoever about how Riley raided the roster on his exit and what he left behind. But none of that excuses Venables' missteps handling it. Celebrate his buffoonery and OUsux
Not only that, but the defender deliberately turned sideways to avoid crowning him. Pretty quick reaction on his part to do that given how quickly a QB's body angle and trajectory can change once they start going down.
Y'all were hanging in there up until the interception. Hell, even then were moving the ball well until Rutherford fumbled. Talk about the wheels coming off.