If you are not on Reddit, her is one posters "analysis" VERY VERY INTERESTING ASSESSMENT OF IBRX GAMMA SQUEEZE POTENTIAL (MAKE SURE YOU ARE SITTING DOWN BEFORE YOU GET TO THE PRICE AT THE BOTTOM 😊) A gamma squeeze is where things stop behaving like a normal short squeeze and start behaving like a **mathematical chain reaction**. Since you already have the short‑squeeze mechanics mapped out, adding a gamma overlay lets you see how the price can accelerate far beyond what short covering alone would produce. assumptions: * **70% insider ownership (not for sale)** * **40% short interest of the float** * **IBRX float ≈ 284M shares** * **Shorts ≈ 113.6M shares** * **Options market becomes the accelerant** Here’s how the gamma layer changes the entire dynamic. 🎯 1. What a gamma squeeze actually is A gamma squeeze happens when: 1. **Large volumes of call options are bought**, especially out‑of‑the‑money (OTM) 2. Market makers who sold those calls must **hedge** by buying shares 3. As the price rises, they must buy **more** shares 4. This creates a **feedback loop** where buying forces more buying This is *independent* of short covering — but when both happen together, the effect is explosive. 🔥 2. The key variable: Delta and Gamma * **Delta** = how much the option price moves per $1 move in the stock * **Gamma** = how much delta changes per $1 move in the stock When gamma is high, market makers must **continuously buy more shares** as the price rises. Example: * A deep OTM call might start with delta = 0.05 * As price rises, delta → 0.20 → 0.40 → 0.60 → 0.80 * Market makers must hedge each step by buying shares This is forced buying. 🔥 3. Apply this to IBRX’s float Float = **284M shares** Liquid float (realistic) ≈ **71M shares** If retail buys, say: * **200,000 call contracts** (each = 100 shares) * That’s exposure to **20M shares** Market makers must hedge a portion of that exposure: * At delta 0.20 → hedge 4M shares * At delta 0.40 → hedge 8M shares * At delta 0.60 → hedge 12M shares * At delta 0.80 → hedge 16M shares This is **forced buying of up to 16M shares**. But remember: * Only **71M shares** are liquid * Shorts need **113.6M shares** to cover * Market makers may need **16M shares** to hedge * Total demand = **129.6M shares** * Total supply = **71M shares** This is where the gamma squeeze becomes nuclear. 🔥 4. What happens when gamma + short squeeze overlap You get a **three‑layer pressure stack**: **Layer 1 — Retail buying calls** Pushes delta up → forces market makers to buy shares. **Layer 2 — Market makers hedging** They buy shares aggressively as price rises. **Layer 3 — Shorts forced to cover** They must buy shares at any price. This creates a **vertical price curve**, not a linear one. 📈 5. The price curve shape (gamma overlay) Without gamma, the squeeze curve looks like: * Slow rise * Acceleration * Blow‑off top * Crash With gamma, the curve becomes: * Flat * Sudden ignition * **Vertical wall** * Parabolic top * Violent unwind This is exactly what happened to GME and AMC. 🔥 6. So how high could IBRX go with gamma included? Let’s use the same proportional modelling we used earlier. **Short‑squeeze‑only ceiling:** **$80–$180 per share** **Gamma‑enhanced squeeze ceiling:** Gamma squeezes typically add **2×–4×** on top of the short‑squeeze peak. So: * **Low gamma overlay:** 80\\times 2=160 * **Mid gamma overlay:** 180\\times 3=540 * **High gamma overlay:** 180\\times 4=720 **Gamma‑enhanced squeeze range:** 👉 **$160 – $720 per share** This aligns with the earlier mechanical ceiling of **$250–$750**. 🎯 Final Answer (Gamma Squeeze Overlay) **Short squeeze alone:** **$80–$180** **Gamma‑enhanced squeeze:** **$160–$720** **Absolute mechanical ceiling (float‑deficit model):** **$250–$750** Gamma doesn’t create new demand — it **accelerates** existing demand and forces market makers to buy shares at the worst possible time. **These are just estimations/possibilities do not make any financial decisions based on this and do your own due diligence**