I don't dispute those are his numbers. I just dispute they're meaningful in any way. In his time with the Angels, he's basically been a poor man's Lucas Duda at the plate.
That'd be a pretty fucking bizarre lie since those pharmaceutical costs and diagnoses will certainly be part of discovery in their lawsuit against the pharmaceutical company. Are you suggesting the doctors are also in on the lie and the city has been spending hundreds of thousands of dollars per year for drugs their employees' children don't actually need in order to bring this lawsuit?
Manafort filed a motion to dismiss the indictment on the basis that the scope of the indictment was outside the Special Counsel’s purview. So the scope of the Special Counsel’s authority is relevant. Where the judge loses me is the suggestion that crimes which were investigated by another office would be outside of the scope on that basis. It also isn’t remotely relevant whether the prosecution of Manafort is a goal in and of itself or merely a tool so the judge is just bloviating there.
Yeah, time travel in this world has a rule that you can't go back to the same time more than once so you only get one bite at the apple so to speak.
They can't just wait until after Rittenhouse has acted and then go back to undo that change because whatever Rittenhouse does would change the future and so in the present day, they would have no way to know what was changed.
I think Congress has the power to prohibit sports gambling nationally (or in certain states) but the bizarre structure of PASPA, where Congress does not criminalize sports gambling but rather forbids states from authorizing sports gambling is constitutionally problematic. Oral argument seemed to indicate a 6-3 decision (conservative 5 plus Breyer) striking it down.
Admittedly this is somewhat low down the list of reasons you’re a bad person.
That you still fail to comprehend that nobody other than the patient or their health insurance is being asked to pay for these treatments is far more insufferable.