I find it more helpful to use the 52/56/60 for their intended advantages than to use one gap for everything. Flopping a 52 is way too hard. When you open the club that much, errant shot percentages increase dramatically.
Yeah. Fan of Westwood. Nice track. Shit location. It’s also a lot more expensive than RB, so trying to see if RB isn’t a more reasonable alternative if the golfing/comraderie is good there.
Still going. They make it intentionally difficult. Documentation requests are endless. Am told we are two weeks away from an “offer”. Been going for two months consistently responding to neverending requests.
I had to send the wife’s Cayenne Hybrid to the Stuttgart pasture. Made it to just shy of 800 miles and it’s crippled. Been in the shop for three months and they have zero clue how to fix it. First lemon law claim I’ve ever had to make and hopefully the last. What a damn headache.
I’m not ready to talk playoffs until we win the damn conference. And I’m first focused on getting through undefeated to a shot to win it.
Playoffs are icing. We haven’t even put the cake in the oven yet.
Most of the models I see predict a strong Cat 1 or modest Cat 2 at landfall.
hard to predict this far out. And water is warm as hell. Either way, it’s going to dump a shit ton of rain.
I must be fucking stooopid because I can’t see any of these tropical models. The websites are completely worthless. Like ECMWF posted above. Where in the fuck does one find that?
Barton is underappreciated for cheap neat drinkers. Can’t recall if I already mentioned a handle of Tom Moore bottle in bond is right around $20-22. It’s almost untouchable at that price point.
That said, I hate the whole concept of “allocation” anyway.
Maybe just make more of it if you think it’s so special? Or are you afraid to find out it’s only special because you say so?